2010/8/10 Juan de Vojníkov <juandevojnikov@gmail.com>

Well, the number of pages is also a question. Now it looks like that it is enough for Foundation to look on the quality and/or vitality of the project. Well there is not other way how to evaluate it.

But according my opinion it doesnt say nothing about Wikiversity. It is a good measure of succes for wp (no. of articles), wikt (no. of words), wb (no. of pages of a textbook). But for wv number of educational resources? How educational resource is defined? Lets have a look on Bloom Clock, it can cover 20% of total article count. I.e. there are 6 thousand pages on the project and 2 thousand are botanical items. So thats why number of pages is not good enough to evaluate wv.

And well, thanks to Philippe Beaudette "after many core contributors left" is a better statement.

I don't want to deprive you of a discussion of Wikiveristy vitality. I think this is the purpose of this mailing list.

However, I would invite either or both of you to start up a new thread on this, as this thread is supposed to be on the

Sandbox Server. I would gladly participate on such a thread, in fact.

If, of course, you guys want to talk more about the Sandbox server, have some suggestions or comments, or a question

on this, please hit reply and wax eloquently. :)

Thanks,

Gerald