And likewise Joe, if there's something missing in the WP article, please add it. The talk page reveals an interesting debate.

On 26/12/2013 5:51 AM, "Joe Corneli" <holtzermann17@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Leigh:

It looks relevant, definitely.  I didn't realize the connection with
Christopher Alexander goes so deep (it's been a while since I looked
at his book).  I'll have to add something about that in the section of
the Peeragogy Handbook on patterns (which I'm revising currently).

Thank you!

Joe

PS.  I added a "See also" link to that article on
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_learning, which is basically the
"literature review" for Peeragogy.

On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Leigh Blackall
<leighblackall@gmail.com> wrote:
> Joe, regarding peeragogy, you interested in checking the Wikipedia article
> Networked learning?
>
> On 25/12/2013 5:47 AM, "Joe Corneli" <holtzermann17@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Abd ulRahman Lomax <abdlomax@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Back to the immediate topic, suppose there is a group of students who
>> > want
>> > to learn math. Perhaps they can find a teacher, but suppose now that
>> > there
>> > is no teacher. Suppose that everyone one of us is such a student, that
>> > there
>> > are no experts. This, in fact, is the position of real scientists. The
>> > "student/teacher" model is for children, and it doesn't necessarily work
>> > well even there, and definitely not for deep education, where it's
>> > necessary
>> > for the student to discover and build understanding out of their own
>> > experience. Otherwise "education" becomes simply filling a data storage
>> > unit
>> > with data, without understanding how to *create* the data (and
>> > understanding
>> > its limitations). Skilled teachers will lead their students through this
>> > process, not just expect them to be baby birds, mouths open to be filled
>> > with the wisdom of the teacher.
>>
>> This is something that we talk a lot about on Yet One Other Website
>> (peeragogy.org).
>>
>> I am sincerely interested to think about how wikiversity does or does
>> not fit together with other efforts.  It certainly can't be insular...
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikiversity-l mailing list
>> Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikiversity-l mailing list
> Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l
>

_______________________________________________
Wikiversity-l mailing list
Wikiversity-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiversity-l