Hi!, thanks for the comments.
I'm not sure that the header is often accurate. My
cousins in Israel
(~16) use only the English version of Windows XP due to localisation
problems. (Mixing of right-to-left Hebrew and left-to-right English
programs, with the close button on the top-left *or* top-right of a
dialog; everything backwards from screenshots with the tray on the
bottom-left and start button on the bottom-right, trouble getting PC
support from English speakers, etc)
Fine, the header might not be accurate. Your
cousins use English
version of Windows, so I guess they are able to understand English at
least a bit. And although their preferred language would be Hebrew,
they get English on Commons. But as soon as they create an account and
log in, they can choose the language in preferences. No problem here.
Fine, the header may not be perfect (but do you have a better idea?),
but it is IMHO better than presenting English to _everyone_.
As long as language selection remains on the front
page (and that will
be up to the wikis), this would be fine for me.
The problem is not in the language
of the contents, but in the
language of interface. There are two reasons why you would visit, say,
cs.wikipedia.org: Either you understand Czech and want to read
something, or you want to e.g. insert interwiki links. For that, it
would be fine if you would be able to create an account without any
knowledge of Czech.
And, as I said, the biggest problem for me lies in the international
wikis like Meta and (especially) Commons. Every anonymous user (=
every user before he/she could get to creating an account) is offered
English interface. How can we expect him/her to create an account, if
he/she does not understand English at all? Should the help page in
each language mention things like "click the second button from the
right, then fill in the upper edit box, ..." ?
-- [[:cs:User:Mormegil | Petr Kadlec ]]