Sorry, I've replied to Sumana directly instead of the mailing list. So now duplicating into the mailing list. Sumana Harihareswara писал 2012-12-19 22:30: Sumana, it's all very good but: 1) I think it's not so comfortable to push other developers personally when adding them as the reviewers... And I don't know whom to add as the reviewer, so I just choose randomly. But what if that guy doesn't want to do review for that extension? For example what if he is already very busy in working on mediawiki _core_, and I ask him to review a trivial extension? 2) Who can verify changes in extensions? There is no CI. So, people who can verify changes and people who can put +2 - are they the same people? But it again leads to short-circuiting all the work to the "core" people, and aren't they already busy? (I assume they are as they don't review all the changes) 3) As a solution, I think it would be good if - at least in not-so-important-as-the-core extensions - the changes merged automatically after getting, for example, 2x "+1"... Or will you end up with changes reviewed by not merged by anyone? And also, maybe it would also be good if the system automatically added some reviewers - randomly or based on some "ownership" rules...