Hi, Risker have opened June 17th a discussion to allow the MediaWiki.org community to adopt an alternate disclosure policy. Quickly, a consensus has been reached. The format chosen, a formal RFC instead of a consultation of MediaWiki.org community, doesn't allow a community member to close the RFC. According https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Process, "Look for the decision from Tim Starling, Brion Vibber, Mark Bergsma, or an appointed delegate." The RFC format is maybe a peculiar chose considering this, as the Wikimedia Foundation TOU provides the alternative policy to be chosen by the Wikimedia Project community. This current discussion doesn't really qualify as an engineering change. So, I hereby request if Tim Starling, Brion Vibber or Mark Bergsma could close the discussion, and I also offers my services to be an appointed delegate with a mandate strictly limited to the closure of the RFC "Alternate disclosure policy", so I could be allowed to close it. In the last case, I'll then implement it (by documenting on meta and creating an help page) immediately. -- Sébastien Santoro aka Dereckson http://www.dereckson.be/