Hi,
Risker have opened June 17th a discussion to allow the
MediaWiki.org
community to adopt an alternate disclosure policy.
Quickly, a consensus has been reached.
The format chosen, a formal RFC instead of a consultation of
MediaWiki.org community, doesn't allow a community member to close the
RFC. According
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Process,
"Look for the decision from Tim Starling, Brion Vibber, Mark Bergsma,
or an appointed delegate."
The RFC format is maybe a peculiar chose considering this, as the
Wikimedia Foundation TOU provides the alternative policy to be chosen
by the Wikimedia Project community. This current discussion doesn't
really qualify as an engineering change.
So, I hereby request if Tim Starling, Brion Vibber or Mark Bergsma
could close the discussion, and I also offers my services to be an
appointed delegate with a mandate strictly limited to the closure of
the RFC "Alternate disclosure policy", so I could be allowed to close
it. In the last case, I'll then implement it (by documenting on meta
and creating an help page) immediately.
--
Sébastien Santoro aka Dereckson
http://www.dereckson.be/