On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 10:26:17AM -0600, Fred Bauder wrote:
on 7/27/03 8:29 AM, Lightning at
lightning(a)chaos-productions.com wrote:
Hunter Peress wrote:
> In irc just now, taw and I discussed the above. He even asks "maybe we should
> restrict editing of
> even registered users".
>
Yet it might prevent the wholesale reverts some folks participate in. If
they had to actually go into the article and edit they might be less ham
handed. I remember one case where both new material and a link correction
had been put in and article and the reverter never caught on that by
reverting he was also reverting a link correction over and over.
Hey, we could write protect the entire Wikipedia and thereby avoid any
future vandalism! Wouldn't this be just great? This would also stop
people who change years in articles to random numbers by changing only
one or two characters.
Come on, this restricting to 50 chars is not serious, is it? That's the
most unwiki proposal I've ever read. Highlight ''suspicious'' edits
in
Recent Changes. Or perhaps not. Even ''unsuspicious'' changes might be
vandalism and be overlooked since they are not marked.
Regards,
JeLuF