On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Quim Gil <qgil(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Tagging describes Phabricator projects a lot better
than nesting. In
Phabricator, projects are tags and tags are projects. This means that even
if the "subproject" concept is officially missing today, you can organize
your work in a similar way.
I partially agree, but just *partially* :) Tagging is just a poor man's
version of classing, since it doesn't let you define the relationship
between tags. True that you can put any task in several projects/tags, the
problem is that the project structure is nevertheless flat:
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/query/all/
Which will become cumbersome to navigate for occasional visitors as the
number of projects goes up.
Exactly. If sister projects want to have Phabricator projects, they could
have them. But there us hundreds of them, so we better
coordinate first.
David, thank you for providing a good excuse to create this task:
Hundreds of them? :D Last time I checked there were between 1 and 12
sisters projects, depending on whom you ask. But if you meant to create
projects for each language version of each sister project, then I agree
that it would be too much. OTOH, with a proper organization it could be
innovative to manage far-reaching content projects through phabricator ;)
Cheers,
Micru