Jakob wrote: I really really hate graphviz. It rarely if ever produces any usable output. The graph is *always* either far too big, or the nodes are too small to read. I've seen much better auto-generated graphs, but unfortunately not from open-source software. Timwi

Last time I used graphviz, it didn't do any kind of anti-aliasing, so the graphs quickly became ugly/illegible if you tried cramming too much information in too small a space. Where there is enough space to render things comfortably, graphviz does quite nicely. For instance, take a look at: http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/examples/directed/fsm.gif http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/examples/directed/datastruct.… http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/examples/directed/world.gif http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/examples/undirected/process.g… I think my solution for bigger graphs at the time was to render them in graphviz, and then resize using ImageMagick. A bicubic resize manages to keep the graphs at least decent - nearest neighbor and bilinear make things *really* ugly (lines will no longer be, er, lines). Cheers, Ivan Brion Vibber wrote:

On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 08:53:54PM +0200, Ingmar Schlecht wrote: We're currently finishing up support for GnuPlot at wikisophia.org (see "Additional Features"); and once we've achieved XML-like syntax, we should be able to integrate it with Mediawiki. Best, Peter -- . ..: