:)
so either remove a unit test for that feature, or just fix the
closeElement but I don't even know if it's really broken, maybe there
is some more magic on behing that would fix the broken html before it
gets printed out
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Petr Bena <benapetr(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think it's the other way, omiting the html tags
is probably correct,
as long as both opening and ending tags are omitted :P so I think the
closeElement function needs a fix
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Ricordisamoa
<ricordisamoa(a)openmailbox.org> wrote:
> Uploaded
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/191473/ for consistency with
> closeElement.
> Thanks for reporting.
>
> Il 18/02/2015 22:38, Petr Bena ha scritto:
>
>> I was digging and I found that commit you sent - eefe1b13a but you can
>> see that this commit modified 2 functions: both open and closeElement,
>> however for some reason the code was removed from closeElement so now
>> calling openElement('html') would produce empty string, while
>> closeElement('html') would produce </html> and that should IMHO
create
>> HTML code that would only contain closing tags in case that html /
>> head didn't have any parameters. Actually head, at least on wmf
>> installation doesn't have any parameters, but it has opening tag,
>> which is weird. (Perhaps wgWellFormedXml is true by default?)
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Brion Vibber <bvibber(a)wikimedia.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Petr Bena <benapetr(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can someone explain the point of these lines to me?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki/blob/master/includes/Html.php#L269
>>>>
>>> Someone thought it would be clever to reduce page size by a few bytes
>>> here
>>> and there. :)
>>>
>>> In practice we always have attributes on the <html> so this would only
>>> take
>>> effect on <head> for this particular case. However there are other
bits
>>> which can be more aggressively dropped, such as closing tags for table
>>> parts etc.
>>>
>>> Here's the commit that added this and related bits:
>>>
>>>
https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki/commit/eefe1b13a382a7d11c2137bbf900b…
>>>
>>>
>>>> If these tags are optional, they can be there, so why remove them? If
>>>> you remove them, you should probably also care about them in
>>>> closeElement() so that mediawiki doesn't produce html which has only
>>>> ending tags for html and head.
>>>>
>>> I believe that's also covered, yes. (Keep in mind also that the way the
>>> HTML content model works is that those elements always exist in the DOM;
>>> the tags can simply be omitted from the markup because they are implied
>>> by
>>> the surrounding content.)
>>>
>>>
>>>> It seems that on WMF installation we don't use anyway as there is
head
>>>> tag. So why is it there? What purpose does it server?
>>>>
>>> I think we still have the well-formed XML mode enabled for
>>> backwards-compatibility?
>>>
>>> -- brion
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikitech-l mailing list
>>> Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikitech-l mailing list
>> Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l