On Sunday 18 July 2004 20:49, Rob Hooft wrote:
Nikola Smolenski wrote:
On Sunday 18 July 2004 17:54, Rob Hooft wrote:
Nikola Smolenski wrote:
Category:Saint/Pope would return all Popes who are
also saints
Category:Pope,Patriarch would return all Popes and Patriarchs
Category:Saint/Pope,Patriarch would return all saints who were Popes or
Patriarchs
I don't see how this can be more than marginally useful unless it also
searches all subcategories to infinite depth (with recursion checks?!).
It would not be so useful with current categories, but I assume that
when/if it is implemented, people would make use of it and not create
subcategories manually. IMO, the finely-tuned categories which are
present now came to be because there is no way to display articles which
belong to multiple categories.
I see what you mean, but with the category system you envision, none of
the categories would be very useful to browse by eye, and that happens
to be a very fruitful way of browsing wikipedia. And all articles would
You are right that most categories would have a lot of articles; but I don't
think that that's not fruitful. If someone needs a list of all cities
featured on WIkipedia, there it is; if someone needs a list of all cities in
Germany, it could be made. With current system, one is fine with a list of
all cities in Germany but there is no way at all of getting a list of all
cities.
need to be added to very, very many categories,
bringing lots of hard
I don't think so. For example, a city in Germany might need to be added to
Category:City and Category:Germany and that's about all. Possibly there are
articles where a lot more could be needed (Leonardo Da Vinci?) but I guess
that they would have a lot of categories anyway.
manual work with it. In any system with subcategories,
a search function
MUST also search the tree.
But you are right, that should be added in the future.