Is it my imagination or has Wikipedia articles lost almost all Google page rank ratings? Check out and test pages listed on: http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_10_Google_hits
Every one I tested was no longer in the top 10. For example, searching for <"Cartesian product"> doesn't seem to find our Wikipedia article (which was the #1 hit) and more shocking is that < "Cartesian product" Wikipedia> doesn't bring up the current .org article either! See
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&as_...
It is as if everything in www.wikipedia.org/wiki/ is being totally ignored by Googlebot for some reason.
-- Daniel Mayer (aka mav)
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 03:09:54PM -0800, Daniel Mayer wrote:
Is it my imagination or has Wikipedia articles lost almost all Google page rank ratings? Check out and test pages listed on: http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_10_Google_hits
Every one I tested was no longer in the top 10. For example, searching for <"Cartesian product"> doesn't seem to find our Wikipedia article (which was the #1 hit) and more shocking is that < "Cartesian product" Wikipedia> doesn't bring up the current .org article either! See
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&as_...
It is as if everything in www.wikipedia.org/wiki/ is being totally ignored by Googlebot for some reason.
As far as I understand how google works, www.wikipedia.com had high page rank and lot of links to it. Now almost all of these links go to www.wikipedia.org, so: * www.wikipedia.org has links but low page rank * www.wikipedia.com has high page rank but few links
So neither will get good scores at google.
It will improve when google will refresh their cache.
As far as I understand how google works, www.wikipedia.com had high page rank and lot of links to it. Now almost all of these links go to www.wikipedia.org, so:
- www.wikipedia.org has links but low page rank
- www.wikipedia.com has high page rank but few links
So neither will get good scores at google.
It will improve when google will refresh their cache.
No, please look at http://www.google.com/search?&q=+site:www.wikipedia.org+wikipedia as mentioned on http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk%3ATop_10_Google_hits
It seems to be another problem.
BTW, while playing with google's news search I found http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/28723.html But I don't really understand what "In time, each publication could become a mini-Wikipedia entry." means. I guess the licences are not compatible.
Kurt
Recent changes is getting swamped. I often find "junk" entries which haven't been cleaned up some 12 hours after creation -- this did not happen, say, 6 months ago.
The problem is that to catch up with the site, I (and other I presume) need to load some 2,500 edits from Recent changes That's over 1MB of HTML, it takes forever to load, and there's no knowing how far back it goes. This morning I had to load 1,500, then 2,000, then finally 2500 to find my last edit.
We need something that lists from a particular date *forwards* for a certain number of entires, as well as current behavious *back* from the present.
What I sugest is this: something that behaves in the opposite way to the "from date D, limit L" syntax in the RC URL. This currently does: "list up to L entries newer than date D, starting from the present and going back toward older entries" This always includes the most recent edit, but not necessarily the date D edit if L is small.
I would like to be able to request: "list up to L entries newer than date D, starting from *date D itself* and going forward" This would always include the date D edit, and not necessarily the most recent edit if L is small. Hope that makes sense. I don't mean that the list order should be reversed -- date D would still be at the foot of the page, newer edits at the top.
With this feature, I could go through these in 500-item chunks, starting from when I logged off and working my way through.
A link on the Recent Changes page would be nice -- something that lists: {number of edits as set in preferences} forwards from date marked at top
We'd be able to copy this link to bookmarks on logging off, and resume from the same place next time
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org