Hi,
I've looked on the wikipedia booksource page and in the archives for the list, and I don't see any conclusions about this topic, so I'll throw it out there. Has there been discussion about using LCCNs, OCLC numbers, or some other standard number for books that were published before ISBNs? It would be nice to be able to provide a link to the unique work in citations where ISBN isn't available, and OCLC number is one way to do so, which works with OCLC and with lots of libraries' OPACs.
I'm guessing this would work something like: OCLCNUM 45951519
For which one link option would be: http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/45951519
Thanks, Matt
On 8/25/06, Matt Hartfield mhartfield@gmail.com wrote:
I'm guessing this would work something like: OCLCNUM 45951519
Yes, see my recent posts where I begged for more magic words...
Actually, if the special page "Special:Booksources" was made customisable, you could do this with a template.
The problem with your proposed OCLCNUM is that "OCLCNUM 459..." is not a recognised format in the way that "ISBN 2409238" is. That truly would be inventing arbitrary syntax - much better dealt with in a template.
Steve
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org