Thomas, just FYI, it is not good etiquette to "Bump" a thread, especially on the same day, and especially doing multiple threads at once. (Some might even consider it to be very annoying, and/or spam-ish). Instead, it is better to wait for at least a week for a reply (because many devs only read mailing lists in bursts of activity). And instead of just saying "bump", perhaps you could try to rephrase your original question, in a clearer or different way. (But still keep it short) E.g. your question in this thread is confusing, due to the missing punctuation, and because it doesn't include any examples or links for context, and because you wrote "Vendro" in the subject but "vendor" in the message. Please please, take the time to copy-edit, for clarity. (semi-relatedly, please don't reply "oh ok" and other such short messages in phabricator tasks. E.g. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T37338#1023615 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T37338#1023447 It clutters the history (and our email inboxes), and isn't necessary - We can all safely assume (one hopes!) that people have read the replies. Thanks, Hope that helps. On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Mulhall <thomasmulhall410(a)yahoo.com> wrote: -- Nick Wilson (Quiddity) Community Liaison Wikimedia Foundation