Have a look at the new version, and tell me that ain't cool ;-)
http://test.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Recentchanges
Someone really needs to have a look at the diff and hist things and 1. make them look nicer 2. make them work correctly
Magnus
Have a look at the new version, and tell me that ain't cool ;-)
http://test.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Recentchanges
That certainly ain't anywhere near cool. I get two parts of the page being showing on top of each other. Somehow, just before "(unreadable) Magnus Manske (uploaded "Arr_r.png": arrow right)" my browser (Netscape 6.2 under Linux) sees a command "go to the top of the page", causing in everything being written over so as to make it unreadable & unusable.
By the way, I'm having the same type of problem with the multi-language search: The Polish results go to the top of the page rather than the bottom, overwriting things. If I search without using 'Polska' (should be 'Polski', btw) as one of the chosen languages it works like it should.
Andre Engels
Andre Engels wrote:
Have a look at the new version, and tell me that ain't cool ;-)
http://test.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Recentchanges
That certainly ain't anywhere near cool. I get two parts of the page being showing on top of each other. Somehow, just before "(unreadable) Magnus Manske (uploaded "Arr_r.png": arrow right)" my browser (Netscape 6.2 under Linux) sees a command "go to the top of the page", causing in everything being written over so as to make it unreadable & unusable.
It is degined for decent browsers only ;-)
It also won't work under current Opera, due to Opera not implementing all standards.
Magnus
On 16 Dec 2002, at 21:39, Magnus Manske wrote:
Have a look at the new version, and tell me that ain't cool ;-)
http://test.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Recentchanges
Any chance of getting the number of changes stat onto the "Short Pages" listing ?
(It'd make it easier to differentiate between newbie experiments and vandalism.)
Imran
Magnus Manske wrote:
Have a look at the new version, and tell me that ain't cool ;-)
That ain't cool:
http://math.ucr.edu/~toby/Recentchanges.bmp
(Sorry, bitmap was the best format that I managed to get for this scrreenshot.) This was with Netscape 6 for Unix with JavaScript turned on, but it looks just the same with Javascript turned off (which is how I normally surf).
-- Toby
Toby Bartels wrote:
This was with Netscape 6 for Unix with JavaScript turned on, but it looks just the same with Javascript turned off (which is how I normally surf).
Obviously, the contents invades the top and sidebar. Does it do that all the time, or just on that new Recent Changes version?
Anyway, it does *not* appear do be a fault of the script, rather one of the browser. Of course, as the script uses some "advanced" features, many old browsers will not display it correctly. I cannot help that. We will, of course, have the "old" RC mode as well, if we ever use this on wikipedia.
So far, I know about these browsers: * IE 6 (probably 4 and above) work * Mozilla (and thus Netscape 7) work * Opera does *not* work * Netscape 6 and below won't work
Anyone try Konqueror yet? What about Mac browsers?
Magnus
On Die, 2002-12-17 at 11:23, Magnus Manske wrote:
Anyone try Konqueror yet?
Konqi is a bit buggy -- sometimes the top link is put below the expanded links for some reason. But it expands the links as it should.
Magnus Manske wrote:
Toby Bartels wrote:
This was with Netscape 6 for Unix with JavaScript turned on, but it looks just the same with Javascript turned off (which is how I normally surf).
Obviously, the contents invades the top and sidebar. Does it do that all the time, or just on that new Recent Changes version?
Only on the new Recentchanges -- not Watchlist, not old Recentchanges.
Anyway, it does *not* appear do be a fault of the script, rather one of the browser. Of course, as the script uses some "advanced" features, many old browsers will not display it correctly. I cannot help that. We will, of course, have the "old" RC mode as well, if we ever use this on wikipedia.
In the meantime, I'm having trouble keeping track of the TeX testing going on on the test site '_`.
So far, I know about these browsers:
- IE 6 (probably 4 and above) work
- Mozilla (and thus Netscape 7) work
- Opera does *not* work
- Netscape 6 and below won't work
The phrasing of this list implies that Netscape 6 is not Mozilla. Unlike Netscape 4 and below, it is.
-- Toby
Toby Bartels wrote:
So far, I know about these browsers:
- IE 6 (probably 4 and above) work
- Mozilla (and thus Netscape 7) work
- Opera does *not* work
- Netscape 6 and below won't work
The phrasing of this list implies that Netscape 6 is not Mozilla. Unlike Netscape 4 and below, it is.
AFAIK, Mozilla (1.0 and above) is the basis for Netscape 7. Am I mistaken? If Netscape 6 would be Mozilla-based, the RC would work there, would it not?
Magnus
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 04:53:57PM +0100, Magnus Manske wrote:
Toby Bartels wrote:
So far, I know about these browsers:
- IE 6 (probably 4 and above) work
- Mozilla (and thus Netscape 7) work
- Opera does *not* work
- Netscape 6 and below won't work
The phrasing of this list implies that Netscape 6 is not Mozilla. Unlike Netscape 4 and below, it is.
AFAIK, Mozilla (1.0 and above) is the basis for Netscape 7. Am I mistaken? If Netscape 6 would be Mozilla-based, the RC would work there, would it not?
Netscape is Mozilla-based, and it's very likely that RC wouldn't work in older Mozillas (N6 was based on Moz0.9 iirc).
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org