At 00:36 27/09/2016, Brian Wolff wrote:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64Mediawiki supports sqlite. And you can pretty much use with any webserver - so are you basically asking for an installer? Some sort of xulrunner-esque thing so the interface doesnt look like a web browser?
I did not know XULetc... So, some parts could be related. Actually the need I have is quite opposite to mediawiki but with the same tools: not to support a community with common knowledge, but to support a single/a small group of users/authors, with sustainable knowledge, i.e. texts I can consantly augment and update, so I can structure my "mneme" and build upon it, for me, for others. The key issue seems to be individual (wikilite) versus community mneme (wikipedia)
I need the wikipedia proven tools and practices under the form of a compact and robuts system I can rely upon and run on my different machines through my dropbox directory (the way I actually use the same wiki on three machines). However, the difficulty are :
1. mediawiki is not documented in that perspective for technically agnostic end-users 2. some of the php tools are not complete for SQLite 3. installation of a new wikilite is still complex and long, I would like to be able to install 30 different ones in one minute for a group of students, with pre-entered pages, forms, docs,mailing lists, etc. 4. a review of extensions into that perspective - introduced as perpetual off-the-shelve part of the experience. 5. farming management and updates (I run around 200 wikilites using symlinks for the current release, each in its own directory) 6. I would like to develop specialized bots for content management and interfacing, etc. that do not necessarily make sense in broad uses. etc.
What I would like to get is an end-user oriented (extension and bot included) documentation anyone can read, understand and use. Yes, an installation and maintenance tool, with various types of use configurations, Then a clear documentation of the maintenance and extension tools with quality control and support. To become an end-user textbase++ system, consultants should be available and turn-click deliveries available (home and in the cloud).
Thx for suggestions. jefsey
-- Brian
On Monday, September 26, 2016, Jefsey jefsey@jefsey.com wrote:
The personal way I am using wikimedia as an SQLite textbase I can easily
copy/backup from machine to machine and modifiy through external bundled applications leads me to consider there is a need for a wikimedia user 100% compatible "WIKILite" integrated/maintained solution set.
K has something like that been investigated in the past? 2. I would be interested by comments on the idea?
- also about the approach that can best help users and possibly
wikimedia dévelopmentHÝH]\ÈH]ÛÜÙ@d individual/professionnal I am interested in multi-agent oriented interwares and would like to investigate "wikilite" networking capabilities (both about what networked architectures could bring, and aboout capacity based content security/protection).
Thank you for your attention.
\Ý£âõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõð___________
Wikitech-l mailing list
ÚZÚ]XÚ[\ÝËwikimedia.org ÎËÛ\ÝËÚZÚ[YYXKÜËÛXZ[X[Û\Ý@nfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
-
Jefsey