We're a public sector organisation, so no we don't have plans along those lines. As the linked blog post suggests, we're happy being as open as possible concerning how we're EAR-ifying SMW. So having a public instance illustrating the SMW structuring and use patterns should help other organisations - commercial or otherwise - achieve something similar. -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: wikitech-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikitech-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] På vegne af Yury Katkov Sendt: 24. juni 2013 13:28 Til: Wikimedia developers Emne: Re: [Wikitech-l] Semantic MediaWiki at the Danish National Library Nice to see you here, Josef! Do you have any plans to provide your EAR to the companies as business solution or part of the consulting service? If so, there is now a list of companies that create their software packages based on MW here, don't hesitate to add yourself here: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Professional_development_and_consulting ----- Yury Katkov, WikiVote On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Josef Assad <jas(a)kulturstyrelsen.dk> wrote: _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Right now, absolutely nothing hand-made beyond having the right properties/categories/templates/forms in SMW. We're actively trying to avoid deep changes. Part of the reason is to improve system sustainability. Another part is, we're not php programmers. :) The enterprise architecture we're reflecting in our SMW is composed of predominantly open source systems, so it comes naturally that we'd release anything we end up writing ourselves. We're very loath to do that, however. We prefer a) using established extensions, b) bug reports and/or enhancement requests (i.e. working through the community)=, c) documenting our work so it is replicable by other actors, and d) scoping the EAR to the extent SMW serves without deep customization (i.e. sacrificing a feature we might need if it requires too much coding). It's still a very young system we're working with, so I can't tell you much more right now than, that it gives us a really good level of flexibility in defining our EA model and populating it with the appropriate metadata and structure. And eventually running governance queries like "if I change this integration protocol, which systems and which users are affected" or "give me a list of the system components which are not under OSI approved licenses". -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: wikitech-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikitech-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] På vegne af Yury Katkov Sendt: 24. juni 2013 13:57 Til: Wikimedia developers Emne: Re: [Wikitech-l] Semantic MediaWiki at the Danish National Library That's even more awesome! Have you modified\extended SMW or other Semantic extensions during your system building? Is there any new code to share? ----- Yury Katkov, WikiVote On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Josef Assad <jas(a)kulturstyrelsen.dk> wrote: _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

On 06/25/2013 01:20 AM, S Page wrote: About $5? :-) -- Marc