On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:35 PM, masti <mastigm(a)gmail.com> wrote: I'm an administrator on the English language Wikipedia, and an OTRS member. On general principles, given those levels of access, unsecure web credentials usage is a no-no (and there's no unsecure access to OTRS and I think the OTRS wiki...). -- -george william herbert george.herbert(a)gmail.com

On 03/30/2010 11:42 PM, Chad wrote: I just wonder while it does not offer anything else than normal access. If you don't want to answer just be polite. masti

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Schneelocke <schneelocke(a)gmail.com> wrote: I've also been able to reload my way out of it when it happens, but the total rate (proxy errors per initial page / access attempts) is high enough to mention at least... 10% plus is pretty noticeable. There may have been periods where it was less failure, but it's been that high for some extended periods I've tried to use it since the outage. It's not a real priority, but irritating enough to bring up. I'd rather me be irritated by this than anything be down with the main insecure site, but if the admins have a chance to look into this I for one would appreciate it. -- -george william herbert george.herbert(a)gmail.com

Platonides wrote: I don't see how that will help, considering how lightly loaded the current secure server is. http://ganglia.wikimedia.org/?r=day&c=Miscellaneous&h=singer.wikime… -- Tim Starling