I read it, I like it, and I find it useful - particularly when I'm in
transit.
I agree it would be neat to be able to use twitter/identica for actual
humans to post stuff, but I don't think these need to be mutually exclusive
goals. Would it be silly to have separate accounts? One specifically for
bot logging and one specifically for actual human communication?
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Roan Kattouw <roan.kattouw(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Guillaume Paumier
<gpaumier(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
I'm wondering if there are actually people
reading all the stuff
that's pushed through these channels.
My gut feeling is that the few people reading these feeds are also
those that would know to check the SLA if they encountered an issue,
or know how to use the RSS feed of the SLA page if they really wanted
the information in real time.
Yeah, I use it, but really just because it's the laziest way to read
the SAL. To be quite honest, my identica noise would be a lot lower
without @wikimediatech .
Meanwhile, we don't really have social media
channels dedicated to
Wikimedia tech stuff, i.e. channels where we can actually post stuff,
links, blog posts, outage info, etc and engage with a larger community
of people interested in our tech operations. I feel that the accounts
would be much more useful if we reduced the amount of semi-random
information we post there.
So, I'm basically proposing to repurpose the @wikimediatech accounts for
this.
Thoughts? Good idea? Bad idea? You don't care?
+1, let's do it.
Roan
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
--
Arthur Richards
Software Engineer
Fundraising/Features/Offline/Mobile
[[User:Awjrichards]]
IRC: awjr
+1-415-839-6885 x6687