On 09/22/2012 02:50 PM, Krinkle wrote:
On Sep 21, 2012, at 4:13 PM, Mark A. Hershberger
That commit is not included. I can merge it in
or make a second RC with
What do you think is the better way to go?
I'd say re-branch from master.
My thinking was to branch from a point that was known -- something whose
issues we knew. I think this worked pretty well.
For instance, the issue Niklas raised was because I used a WMF branch.
I'm now thinking that I'll just stick with the 1.20wmf12 and just apply
the patch he pointed to. This is in the vein of sticking to known issues.
What do you think?