On 03/14/2013 08:36 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
And I wouldn't be too quick to celebrate the
increased vendor lock-in
of a large percentage of the open source community into an ecosystem
of partially proprietary tools and services (the GitHub engine itself,
the official GitHub applications, etc.). Gerrit and other open source
git repo management and code review tools are one of the best hopes
for the development of a viable alternative. Unlike GitHub, Gerrit can
be improved by its users over time, and the issues that frustrate and
annoy us about it _can_ be fixed (and indeed, many have been). Yes to
better pull request management from GitHub. But let's stop complaining
about Gerrit, and instead get both functionality and UX issues into
their bug tracker, and help get them fixed. Erik
That's a good argument. Someone mentioned GitLab though. If I have more
time I'll go again through the list of our requirements and what it offers.
--
Juliusz