I'm not saying we have any such code, I'm asking what to do when one wants
to introduce such code. It's entirely feasible some new functionality
requires serializable transactions, so we might want to keep that into
consideration.
Sent from my Android phone.
On 24 Aug 2012 00:30, "Platonides" <Platonides(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 23/08/12 23:54, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
One concern I have with big transcations that have lots of stuff in them
is
that some code might get called in which needs to
run in a transaction
with
a higher isolation level then the current one.
For MySQLs InnoDB the
default is repeatable read, so if you have code that requires
serializability and gets called during that transaction, you're basically
fucked. Or am I missing something?
Cheers
I don't think we have any code requiring a different transaction isolation.
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l