On 18 March 2018 at 10:56, Isarra Yos <zhorishna(a)gmail.com> wrote:
There are also some problems that need addressing down the road: that I'm
not sure how safe it is for caching and the like to just go moving
images/css files around willy-nilly, that there are no 'standard' skin
practices as far as anyone can tell, and that some people seem to think
MonoBook is bad and not worth this. But MonoBook is not bad. It is a
delightful skin. We should preserve it, and not just in formaldehyde.
Just make it MonoBookV5? *runs*, or more realistically V2 then
progressively get rid of the orginal MonoBook?