On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 08:10:53PM +0200, Platonides wrote:
This is correct rfc behaviour, the user name part of
the email address
must be left unchanged, only the system storing it can perform
case-transformations on it, as opposed to the host, which should be
lower case, but as most email providers are cese-insensitive (is anyone
case-sensitive?)
Per the spec: LHSs of mailbox names have case sensitivity that is
implementation-dependent and must be treated as case-sensitive.
RHSs of mailbox names are -- these days -- domain names, and domain
names are case insensitive by their spec.
Well, that's what i said, or at least intended to.
I misunderstood you to be talking about RHSs. LHSs *must* be treated
as case-sensitive, regardless how many providers don't actually do it
that way.
RFC 2822 and
1136, I think.
My think is that they're 821 and 2821 :-)
The case-insensitivity of RHSs devolves from the DNS RFCs, so neither
2821 nor 2822. RFC 1035, actually, s 2.3.3.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra(a)baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates
http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA
http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274