On 13/08/07, Rob Church <robchur(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Wasn't the Communications Committee supposed to
ensure that users were
advised of what would happen?
If there is a lack of communication, then it's not the fault of the
development team, it's the fault of the group which was tasked with
communicating. If there is no such group, then the blame rests higher.
That there are large numbers of long-term users who, at this time,
still don't know the precise facts (not the rumours) about it, well,
that screams "unacceptable" to me.
You tell us what's happening, we'll tell the world! We don't know a
damn thing either. We woulda thought "ask the devs."
So. What's happening with SUL?
alternate answer: You want the job? It's yours! So, Rob. What's your
publicity programme? I'm particularly interested in your sources for
the information in question.
(Getting internal information bearing a close resemblance to pulling
teeth is an ongoing problem for the comcom; you aren't helping with
this shit.)
- d.