On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Christian Aistleitner
<christian(a)quelltextlich.at> wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 08:28:25PM -0700, Rob Lanphier wrote:
The Bugzilla-based solution has some of the
advantages of the
MediaWiki-based solution. We may be able to implement it more quickly
than something native to Gerrit because we're already working on
Bugzilla integration, and we get features like queries for free, as
well as the minor convenience of not having to have a new database
table or two to manage.
The problem at this point is that the gerrit-plugin interface is
rather new, and that shows at various ends:
* It's not possible to add GUI elements from a plugin.
* Plugins cannot add their own database tables through gerrit.
[...]
So whatever we could possibly get into upstream gerrit, we should
really try to get into upstream and not put into the plugin.
But thinking about whether gerrit or bugzilla would be the correct
place to store those tags ...
It seems to me that the tags are not really tied to issues or changes,
but rather to commits...
Wouldn't "git notes" be a good match [1]?