Wikitech-l,

Hello. I have a question about the HTML output of wiki parsers. I wonder about how simple or complex that it would be for a wiki parser to output, instead of a flat document structure inside of a <div> element, an <article> element containing nested <section> elements?

Recently, in the Community Wishlist Survey Sandbox, the speech synthesis of Wikipedia articles was broached. The proposer of these ideas indicated that, for best results, some content, e.g., “See also” sections, should not be synthesized.

In response to these interesting ideas, I mentioned some ideas from EPUB, referencing pronunciation lexicons from HTML and SSML attributes in HTML, the CSS Speech Module, and that output HTML content could be styled using the CSS Speech Module’s speak property.

In these regards, I started thinking about how one might extend wikitext syntax to be able to style sections, e.g.,:

== See also == {style="speak:never"}

Next, I inspected the HTML of some Wikipedia articles and realized that, due to the structure of the output HTML documents, it isn’t simple to style or to add attributes to sections. There are only <h2>, <h3>, <h4> (et cetera) elements inside of a containing <div> element; sections are not yet structured elements.

The gist is that, instead of outputting HTML like:

<div class="mw-parser-output">

  <h2><span class="mw-headline" id="Heading">Heading</span></h2>

  <p>Paragraph 1</p>

  <p>Paragraph 2</p>

  <h3><span class="mw-headline" id="Subheading">Subheading</span></h3>

  <p>Paragraph 3</p>

  <p>Paragraph 4</p>

</div>

could a wiki parser output HTML5 like:

<article class="mw-parser-output">

  <section id="Heading">

    <header><h2><span class="mw-headline">Heading</span></h2></header>

    <p>Paragraph 1</p>

    <p>Paragraph 2</p>

    <section id="Subheading">

      <header><h3><span class="mw-headline">Subheading</span></h3></header>

      <p>Paragraph 3</p>

      <p>Paragraph 4</p>

    </section>

  </section>

</article>

Initial thoughts regarding the latter HTML5 include that it is better structured, more semantic, more styleable, and potentially more accessible. If there is any interest, I could write up some lengthier discussion about one versus the other, why one might be better – and more useful – than the other.

Is this the correct mailing list to discuss any of these wiki technology, wiki parsing, wikitext, document model, and HTML5 output topics?

Best regards,

Adam