On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Alex Brollo
Browsing the html code of source pages, I found
this statement into a html
*Expensive parser function count: 0/500*
I'd like to use this statement to evaluate "lightness" of a page, mainly
testing the expensiveness of templates into the page but: in your opinion,
given that the best would be a 0/500 value, what are limits for a good,
moderately complex, complex page, just to have a try to work about? What is
a really alarming value that needs fast fixing?
A really alarming value that needs fast fixing would be, approximately
speaking, 501 or higher. That's why the maximum is there. We don't
leave fixing this kind of thing to users.
I think the maximum was set to 100 initially, and raised to 500 due to
user complaints. I'd be completely happy if users fixed all the
templates that caused pages to use more than 100, then we could put
the limit back down.