Tim Starling (t.starling(a)physics.unimelb.edu.au) [050401 18:52]:
Lee Daniel Crocker wrote:
> Forgive me if there was a big discussion of this
while I was in lurker
> mode for the past year or so, but is it really a good idea to allow
> arbitrary transclusions at all? I can see the usefulness of templates
> overriding the problems and limiting their spread to a few cases; but
> arbitrarily including text that constantly changes seems like a good
> way to screw up things like article provenance, evaluations, and such.
It was a bad idea. The users made me do it.
Hey, Paul T. Riddell has an FBI file for selling secrets to the Daleks.
http://web.archive.org/web/20020225052146/www.hpoo.com/columns/hells/news45…
- d.