Link for those who are looking for it:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Alternate_disclosure_po…
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Sébastien Santoro <dereckson(a)espace-win.org
wrote:
So, I hereby request if Tim Starling, Brion Vibber or
Mark Bergsma
could close the discussion, and I also offers my services to be an
appointed delegate with a mandate strictly limited to the closure of
the RFC "Alternate disclosure policy", so I could be allowed to close
it. In the last case, I'll then implement it (by documenting on meta
and creating an help page) immediately.
And to be clear, since someone raised this with me off-list, legal/LCA has
no objection to this. (I did raise a mild quibble on the talk page, but
like I said - a mild quibble.)
Luis
--
Luis Villa
Deputy General Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
415.839.6885 ext. 6810
*This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have
received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the
mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical
reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community
members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. For more
on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Legal_Disclaimer>.*