Tim Starling wrote:
the patch at bug 14727
to ensure it doesn't produce invalid XHTML. ;)
That bug is not severe enough to justify the hassle of maintaining a fork.
You should try to fix it upstream.
-- Tim Starling
Thanks for the answer, Tim.
I sent the patch upstream just after creating it at the bug, but I
haven't got an answer.
Will try to poke them again.