In one way or in another, you WILL have to reach a consensus before moving it back to the mainspace, or before deleting the content. To me this kind of talks *are* AFDs, hence I don't see the point of a Trivia: namespace, really.
2007/12/31, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.com:
On Dec 30, 2007 5:32 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/12/2007, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.com wrote:
Before you go off too far on this idea, I'm about to float something on wikien-l about a new "Trivia:" namespace...
If it's encyclopaedic, it should go in the main namespace, if it's not, it shouldn't be in Wikipedia. Either way, a trivia namespace is not required.
Trivia is not for non-encyclopedic stuff. It's for stuff about which notability has not achieved consensus, but which has some claim to notability.
The same rules would apply there, but instead of AFDing non-notable stuff, you do an article move to Trivia:Article. It still has to meet RS, V, NOR, BLP, etc.
-- -george william herbert george.herbert@gmail.com
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l