Giving them editprotected sort of rights would put up a high burden of trust,
they may as well be an admin. Not to mention that when a page is
full-protected, NO ONE should be editing (save simple grammer/spelling fixes
maybe), even admins.
Cascading semi is software supported, given the removal of 1-2 lines of
code, but it isn't really that useful anyway. Even if we had it, it would
rarely be used.
The 'Editor' (the working name) rights from the FlaggedRevs extension gives
rollback/review rights. That may be better suited. It also scales better.
Cascading editor protection might have it's uses, such as a way to stop
determined socks from using throwaway accounts or less obvious things.
Still, I really don't want a growth in protection. Pages should be as
editable as possible.
At any rate, much of this is implementable, so it is not really a dev
question, this thread may be best elsewhere, where it could actually gain
support first. We don't want to waste time code for some unwanted change.
Danny B. wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to throw in my idea to get some suggestions.
Because I've been contacted couple times by different wiki admins as well
as WMF-wikis' users about that, I thought it would be good idea to
incorporate it in MediaWiki.
The idea is to create another default group of users with working title
"poweruser" since the step between normal user and sysop is too high. The
most often request was to have poweruser to be able to edit protected
pages without being able to change the level of the protection.
Therefore I filed bug 10897 to get the necessary prerequisites. Later on
I've been explained on #mediawiki there might be problems with backward
compatibility, so I've reformulated it in bug 10974.
However, during the talk on #mediawiki about technical stuff about
"editprotected" right the opinion it's not necessary to have another
default group ("poweruser") popped up. That's why I decided to throw it in
to see more opinions about that.
Now some cases why I think it would be reasonable to have it as default:
* Having poweruser able to edit protected pages could mean that user
gained higher level of reliability or trust. So if the wiki has say half
of articles protected (one admin told me he set his wiki to subjects are
protected, their talkpages are open), currently there would have to be a
bunch of sysops to be able to edit it which is unwanted.
* There's no cascade semi-protection at the moment available, so eg. if
Main Page is protected with cascade, normal users can't simply edit its
parts such as article/image of the week, did you know..., actualities etc.
Sysops have to take care about which is not flexible. Those parts are most
usually edited by same people, so these could be the members of the
poweruser group.
Summary:
My idea is to add new default group "poweruser" (or choose any other name)
with default rights same to normal user plus the new "editprotected" right
by default since it's the most requested. Each wiki could add more rights
on demand then.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
Kind regards
Danny B.
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/New-default-user-group-tf4287163.html#a12204899
Sent from the Wikipedia Developers mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.