Hey Andrew — I'm excited you're excited :)Adding the nice and necessary features needed to move from Gerrit → GitLab are on our roadmap: test runners, image builders, Phabricator integration, IRC bots. But we haven't talked about doc publishing.Since doc.wikimedia.org now lives outside our integration infrastructure, it should be possible—an rsync away, really. But it's likely blocked on a trusted build environment (if I remember correctly, some of these docs require server-side components—although this may be limited to a subset of projects).Sounds like you have an early use-case for this? Mind filing a task on the GitLab backlog so we can start noodling together?Thanks!– TylerOn Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:35 AM Andrew Otto <otto@wikimedia.org> wrote:All of these things are amazing, I cannot wait!How about publishing html docs to doc.wikimedia.org?!?! :)On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 5:14 PM Tyler Cipriani <tcipriani@wikimedia.org> wrote:Reading time: 1 minuteThis email is an information-only (no action needed), brief, regular* update on Wikimedia GitLab happenings.___🚧 Status: Under construction!
- Login to GitLab with your Wikimedia Developer account
- Request a team or group for your work using the GitLab project request form on Phabricator
There are already more than 30 groups and more than 200 projects on our GitLab instance.
___📰 Updates
Release Engineering wrote a blog post about GitLab user group changes.
ServiceOps is building a cluster of machines to build production Docker images from code on GitLab.
Release Engineering built a proof-of-concept for instance-wide job runners on Digital Ocean.
- Release Engineering is working on changes to Blubber to support GitLab image building.
___🤔 Questions?
- Ask in IRC: #wikimedia-gitlab
- Or on Phabricator: GitLab
- Reply here!
___Enjoy your GitLab-ing!– Tyler*: this is the first one; "regular" has to start somewhere