-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Magnus Manske wrote:
Ray Saintonge wrote:
Magnus Manske wrote:
Neil Harris wrote:
Am I being naive here, or would a super-dumb
implementation with a
single table with the columns shown below be enough to work in the
short term?
Page_ID
Revision_ID
User_ID
Rating_ID
Rating value
Timestamp
This is what I did; no timestamp, but a varchar for comments. Topics to
rate and their range (e.g, 1-5) are encoded here as well for user #0.
That's about as dumb as it gets ;-)
I still prefer a 0-10 range of ratings. I think a decimal
normalization would be easier to work with in any subsequent analysis
of results.
One can set the range for each topic individually.
BTW, with values 0-10, you'd have eleven values...
Magnus
11 values, 10 histogram bins. It'd be dreadfully easy to make a page
like Special:Pages_Rated_0_to_1 with that kind of an approach, and to
make a table of links to each of these ten pages.
- --Chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDZ4ZK0dXuuZr00J4RAsjXAJ43EzUDPkYKlK50hhn/A1nGqU7uEwCeOG3d
2edq3UasVPTz49OKuRm0Fno=
=Ligb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----