Hi John --
What do you think would be a better sample? My feeling is that a 24 hour
period captures global usage and we're currently at about .01% of page
views come to these domains is a pretty good indicator. Keep in mind we're
doing this for a legitimate technical reason and not arbitrarily. Looking
at the UAs is a good idea and we will do that.
thanks,
-Toby
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 6:55 AM, John <phoenixoverride(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Can we look at a wider sample? using a single day as
judgement factor is a
bad idea. However if the data supports your position I dont see any serious
problems. You might want to take a look at either the UA's or refering
sources to see if there is a primary source for the traffic and mitigate
that.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Adam Baso <abaso(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Looks like the user pageviews for
wap.wikipedia.org and
mobile.wikipedia.org
subdomains are approximately 0.02% of the size of pageviews for
m.wikipedia.org subdomains based on a recent one day check.
hive> select count(*) from
wmf.webrequest where
year = 2015 and month = 7 and day = 14
and access_method = 'mobile web'
and (uri_host like '%.wap.wikipedia.org' OR uri_host like '%.
mobile.wikipedia.org')
and is_pageview = true and agent_type = 'user';
35,543
hive> select count(*) from
wmf.webrequest where
year = 2015 and month = 7 and day = 14
and access_method = 'mobile web'
and uri_host like '%.m.wikipedia.org'
and is_pageview = true and agent_type = 'user';
202,024,891
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:41 AM, John <phoenixoverride(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> ... Have we done any analysis on usage of those subdomains?
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Adam Baso <abaso(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
> There's a ticket for removing
mobile.wikipedia.org and
wap.wikipedia.org
> > domains/subdomains, which are legacy domain names superceded by
> >
m.wikipedia.org and its subdomains.
> >
> >
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T104942
> >
> > The rationale for the removal of these legacy domain names is to help
> > support HSTS preloading in browsers with the existing TLS SAN cert.
> >
> > After review of the ticket, can anyone think of a compelling reason
to
keep
> those old domain names?
>
> I'm going to open a separate thread on mobile-l about this given this
is
> > more mobile-targeted, yet some people only operate on one of
wikitech-l
or
mobile-l.
-Adam
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l