On 7/9/07, Andrew Garrett <andrew(a)epstone.net> wrote:
On 7/9/07, Rob Church <robchur(a)gmail.com>
My gut says it might be saner to return a simple
array( const, message
), where const is one of a set of constants defined somewhere, perhaps
abusing a class for namespace purposes, which provides a simple
meaningful check. You might as well render the message *for* the
caller, since you're basically passing back all the pieces.
really interesting, and good, idea. It makes interpreting the
data for purposes other than simply displaying the message much easier
(and it saves an issue I had with the cascading protection message.
On second thoughts, I wonder if this'd make it harder to take and
the parameters, which are passed back in the array currently, but
you'd have to do some string parsing to get them with your