On 28 June 2010 12:19, Carl (CBM) cbm.wikipedia@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Rob Lanphier robla@wikimedia.org wrote:
"Unaccept" seems suitably rare that I think we should consider a confirmation screen which shows the effect of unaccepting (i.e. a diff between the latest accepted revision and the penultimate accepted revision). Does that seem like a reasonable enough failsafe to keep this from being used unintentionally? This seems beneficial even in the case where the reviewer knew they were hitting "unaccept".
I had the impression that "unaccept" does not add a new revision to the page, it simply removes the db entry that the revision in question was "accepted". Is that wrong?
That's correct, but from the point of view of someone only viewing accepted versions it will be like a revert.