Neil Harris wrote:
Am I being naive here, or would a super-dumb
implementation with a
single table with the columns shown below be enough to work in the
short term?
Page_ID
Revision_ID
User_ID
Rating_ID
Rating value
Timestamp
This is what I did; no timestamp, but a varchar for comments. Topics to
rate and their range (e.g, 1-5) are encoded here as well for user #0.
That's about as dumb as it gets ;-)
I still prefer a 0-10 range of ratings. I think a decimal
normalization would be easier to work with in any subsequent analysis
of results.