On Tuesday 25 April 2006 22:13, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 07:21:37PM +0200, Tels wrote:
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 16:03, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
My one fond wish, which I've come to
understand will never happen
with MWtext, is to get *bold* and _italics_ as markup tokens,
Wouldn't that be *bold*, _underlined_ and /italics/? :-P
I'd rather not. /italics/ always looks like a matching regex to me.
Yeah you are right. Funny thing is, even with me /(writing|carving)/
regexs thousand times a day, it didnt occur to me that it looks like
I still like the POD way to do B<bold>, I<italics>, U<underlined>,
C<code>, L<link> text. But its more to type, especially the shifty angle
As they say: simple, easy-to-parse, nestable. Pick two :)
Signed on Wed Apr 26 00:47:06 2006 with key 0x93B84C15.
Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/
PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc
or per email.
"Let's say there are a thousand. But there are 284 million people in
this country. You can't have public policy that is aimed at 100,000
people when the other multi-multi-millions are also involved. You can't
do it that way." - Jack Valenty in http://tinyurl.com/2y65n