On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Gabriel Wicke <gwicke(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
I don't see a huge case for discussing this in the RFC meeting. It's mostly
about the implementation at this point, and IMO code review and pull
requests are a better place to discuss that. We'll post benchmark results
when we have them.
Do you see anything that you feel would be better discussed in an RFC
review?
I'm eager to get some closure on the overall RFC about HTML templating
myself. Am I right to assume that the process is:
1. Get Knockoff complete enough that we can fairly evaluate it against the
other proposals
2. Reopen the conversation about various alternatives
3. Pick something
Correct?
Rob