It definitely took place ages ago, read the Meta page on it.
On 8/13/07, Anthony <wikitech(a)inbox.org> wrote:
On 8/13/07, Mark Clements <gmane(a)kennel17.co.uk> wrote:
"Anthony" <wikitech(a)inbox.org>
wrote in
message news:71cd4dd90708131131k36ef2c17k39d1aae4234b7311@mail.gmail.com
...
On
8/13/07, Jay R. Ashworth <jra(a)baylink.com>
wrote:
I guess what has to happen before this can really be discussed is we
need to drop the hypotheticals and come up with a semi-accurate list
of actual conflicts. If a good portion of the conflicts are actually
causing problems, then it's one thing. If most of them are just good
faith collisions which wouldn't have even been discovered were it not
for SUL, then it's another.
As far as I am aware, the time for discussion ended months, if not a
year
ago, and now it is simply a matter of waiting for
the implementation to
be
completed. If that is the case (and correct me
if it isn't) then this
whole
conversation is somewhat pointless.
Considering that until a few weeks ago I (who follow the relevant
mailing lists rather closely) didn't even know what exactly SUL was, I
have to say that I don't think that is the case. A great many people
right now still don't know what this whole SUL thing means. The
documentation on it is inconsistent. Tons of misinformation is being
spread.
When was this discussion period announced?
I don't think it's too late. It certainly won't be too late before
user accounts start getting forcibly renamed, and even after that we
could probably still change our minds.
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023
---
Note: This e-mail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails sent
to
this address will probably get lost.