Speaking of which, Lua looks like a wonderful solutin. We just need a more
native integration into MediaWiki that hides the fact that you're actually
using Lua.
It doesn't look like Extension:Lua even works right now (per the talk page -
not my actual testing). What do you think Tim?
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Tim Starling <tstarling(a)wikimedia.org>wrote;wrote:
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
* #len is implemented by [[Template:Str len]].
Running {{str len}} it
on a string of 250 a's gives preprocessor node count 152, post-expand
include size 4597 bytes, template argument size 7430 bytes.
* #pos is implemented by [[Template:Str find]]. Trying to find b in a
string of 250 a's gives preprocessor node count 1354, post-expand
include size 5740 bytes, template argument size 50320 bytes.
* #substr is implemented by [[Template:Str sub]]. Using the same
string of a's, with start 30 and length 20, gives preprocessor node
count 1534, post-expand include size 13400 bytes, template argument
size 44578 bytes.
Is there any good reason not to enable these three string functions, at
least?
Those templates can be defeated by reducing the functionality of
padleft/padright, and I think that would be a better course of action
than enabling the string functions.
The set of string functions you describe are not the most innocuous
ones, they're the ones I most want to keep out of Wikipedia, at least
until we have a decent server-side scripting language in parallel.
-- Tim Starling
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l