On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Petr Kadlec <petr.kadlec(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6 April 2011 23:21, Mark A. Hershberger
<mhershberger(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
This week, I'm going to focus on
Parser-related bugs. There are
currently 10 bugs on the with the “triage” keyword applied. A bug
triage meeting needs about 30 bugs, so I have room for about 20 more
right now. I'll be adding to the list before Monday, but this is your
chance to get WMF's developers talking about YOUR favorite parser bug by
adding the “triage” keyword.
This is generally a nice idea, of course, but in the specific case of
parser bugs, we already have a keyword for that; I guess you could get
your ~30 bugs just by
<https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?keywords=parser&bug_severity=blocker&bug_severity=critical&bug_severity=major&bug_severity=normal&bug_severity=minor&bug_severity=trivial&resolution=--->
;-)
This is an area where the community can help. Of that query, only
about half of them have seen any activity at all this calendar year.
We spend *some* time in the triage meeting with old bugs that are
still a problem, but bugs where no one is even commenting generally
are de facto low priority bugs.
Now, if you see something that you think should be high priority on
that list, you should provide your reasoning in comment on one of
those bugs. Lots of "+1s" are noisy and useless, but if a bug hasn't
seen any activity for a few months, it's useful to provide a reminder
about why the bug is still important.
Rob