On 4/19/06, Rob Church <robchur(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 19/04/06, Tels <nospam-abuse(a)bloodgate.com>
It doesn't say what it is for, or what values
it could have, or whatever.
Almost every member or class definition I looked at looks like this,
circulare references between files but nowhere any real doc beyond "it
exist and is called foo".
Since at least for members there are usually comments (like for mTitle),
should't the autogenerated doc pick them up and display them somehow?
As Avar said in a previous message; the documentation is limited in
terms of the original code; if the comments to document it were not
there, then the generated documentation will be sparse.
In my experience, this is a good time to mention that one of the best
ways to learn a codebase is to go in and document it, so if there are
any wanna-be MediaWiki masters out there... :)
(It is also possible that doxygen isn't picking up the member
comments, though. Running doxygen locally and consulting the log it
generates should give some clues, as will making sure that the
comments are formatted in a way that will get picked up, although
phpDoc and dOxygen are pretty friendly towards documetation styles.)
Torque Technologies Director