As far as i know, the current trend is more towards Git than towards
Bazaar. It's not a bad system, but Git seems to have more traction at
the moment.
-- Hay
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Bryan Tong
Minh<bryan.tongminh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:29 PM,
Chad<innocentkiller(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Blasphemy!
/me goes and sits on the SVN server and refuses to leave
We could take a look at Bazaar. It has pretty good SVN integration.You
can create a (centralized) checkout of an SVN repo and when you commit
into that centralized checkout from your local Bazaar branch it should
commit into the master SVN as well (as I understand it). This would
allow peaceful concurrent use of a centralized and decentralized
version control system (although Bazaar itself supports centralized
use as well). Plus it works natively on Windows without icky POSIX
emulation layers.
I have not had time myself to look into the details yet, so I don't
know if what I wrote actually works, but it looks promising from what
I read.
Bryan
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l