On 5/8/06, Uwe Brauer oub@mat.ucm.es wrote:
Your tool is an experiment? Is intended to be included in media wiki?
Experiment is the right word for it. I've identified a lot of uses for it, and the talk pages on Wikipedia are an ideal typification of why it would be valuable. Like most online communication tools it's designed to facilitate communication between individuals, but has no built in facilities for the organization of thoughts, nor for the aggregation of the participant's ideas into a single central consensus.
This is especially true for the wikipedia, where one discussion page is being used to determine the consensus on a myriad of ideas presented in any single entry. I think it would be an excellent proving grounds for the tool.