No, it is not meant to replace a [.com] RFC2606 compliant example URL with a [.org] RFC2606 compliant example URL. This is what I meant to explain in the commit message. What was causing the unclarity exactly?
Cheers! Siebrand
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: wikitech-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikitech-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] Namens Simetrical Verzonden: vrijdag 11 juli 2008 18:22 Aan: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org Onderwerp: Re: [Wikitech-l] [MediaWiki-CVS] SVN: [37552]trunk/phase3/languages/messages/MessagesEn.php
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 4:57 AM, siebrand@svn.wikimedia.org wrote:
Log Message:
Use a .org RFC2606 compliant example URL . . . -'extlink_sample' => 'http://www.example.com link title', +'extlink_sample' => 'http://www.example.org link title',
Is this meant to imply that example.com is not an RFC 2606-compliant example URL? Because it is. RFC 2606 reserves the three domain names example.com, example.net, and example.org, as well as the four top-level domain names .test, .example, .invalid, and .localhost.