On 21/08/06, Steve Bennett stevage@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/21/06, Rob Church robchur@gmail.com wrote:
Wikipedians prefer to highlight and tag problems than to take 30 seconds to fix them, it seems. I can understand that larger cases crop up, and warrant attention from more than one person, but stupid little unsourced stubs don't need to be tagged - either find a source on the web, or find reference that a source might exist within five minutes, or "prod" it, or whatever we do now.
Are you talking about presumed hoaxes or presumed good articles that simply don't have any citations?
I'm talking about the little stub that looks 50/50, or the single spelling error that causes them to roll out the {{cleanup}} tag.
Do we still have AfD, or was it renamed again?
You mean Arguments for Dimwits?
Those are the best kind!
Rob Church