On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Siebrand Mazeland s.mazeland@xs4all.nl wrote:
No, it is not meant to replace a [.com] RFC2606 compliant example URL with a [.org] RFC2606 compliant example URL. This is what I meant to explain in the commit message. What was causing the unclarity exactly?
I interpreted the ".org RFC2606 compliant" modifier to be the reason you were committing the change, since I saw no other explanation of why you were doing it. I guess it's just because we like .org's more than .com's or something, which is fine, but the commit message didn't mention that.