I agree with extension. For example, my school's IT department uses a wiki to collect information about common computer problems, and on a wiki about computer problems, none of the issues share the same name.
*--* *Tyler Romeo* Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015 Major in Computer Science www.whizkidztech.com | tylerromeo@gmail.com
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Chad innocentkiller@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkaldari@wikimedia.org wrote:
Personally, I don't mind implementing it either way, but would like to
have
consensus on where this code should reside. The code is pretty clean and lightweight, so it wouldn't increase the footprint of core MediaWiki (it would actually decrease the existing footprint slightly since it replaces more hacky existing core code). So core bloat isn't really an issue. The issue is: Where does it most make sense for disambiguation features to reside? Should disambiguation pages be supported out of the box or
require
an extension to fully support?
I'd say extension. I can think of lots of wikis that don't use disambiguation pages. If we really want, we can stash it in the default tarball along with the other bundled extensions.
-Chad
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l